TKUA 48TH THESIS DESIGN
前言
Prologue
畢業設計是大學的句點，亦是踏上社會的起點，在這學生與社會交界的畢業前夕是一個非常曖昧的時間交界點，在這兩個流逝的過程之間，透過展覽作為短暫的時空駐留。讓我們停滯在這小小的時間上，認真地留下足跡，並且回望、檢視自己的步伐。在這展覽的場域中，我們將不再是自己與自己的對話，而是暫留在作品與作品之間、展覽者與觀展者之間、學校與學校之間、校園與社會之間，我們彼此游移、交流然後再邁開步伐繼續下去。
Thesis Design has always been considered not only as the finale of undergraduate students, but as the debut while we intend to embrace our career and society in the future. The exhibition is one of the crucial turning points for each architectural student. During the exhibition, people will look through various projects, and each one of them is attentively raised by us. Though the profound discussions and reviews will be taken place in every corner in the exhibition field, we deeply believe the ripple will go along with visitors in their way home. Such effects are derived from our intention and purpose, presenting a particular and current phenomenon, which is the area we like to trigger the conversations not just among TKUA students, but among projects, participants, and students from other architecture schools. That is the area in between. After such event, we will carry on our belief and statement in the world of architecture.
概念
Concept
IN BETWEEN
「之間」的突顯，為藤本壯介曾經在《建築誕生的時候》(《建築が生まれるとき》)所提到的，在都市居住最有趣的地方就是在於這種中間領域的豐富性。二十一世紀的我們，面臨著資訊爆炸時代、無國界的交流，看似一種混血、融合的豐富狀態，其實卻是水火不容的亂象，導致了一些領域的退步、文化的消失。而我們想借由本次的主題與展覽來表達，一種重新定義展覽的形式，並能傳達我們的精神，我們認為的時代精神。
「之間」之所以豐富，是在於人與人的存在與相互交流。我們是獨立的個體，有著獨立的思維，彼此有著獨特的個性，可以藉由彼此的互動，激發更多創意的產生。最可貴的，還是你與我的「個體性」所產生「之間」的豐富性。
The idea of “In-between” was first mentioned in the book, When the Architecture was born, written by architect Sou Fujimoto. In-between means transition, a dynamic condition toward next and upper stage, and an awkward situation that is not clearly defined by obvious intention and extent. In Fujimoto’s language, instead of settlement and security, In-Between means more possibilities and opportunities in terms of its abundance and challenge, ruleless and unlimited.
Of high technology and information in the 21st century, we live in a boundaryless society where we freely exchange thoughts with others. That is the most valuable thing among individuals and groups because it brings up more dialogues, creativeness and inspirations. The blending among versatile differences may look well and thorough above the surface, however, it leads to disorder and chaos underneath. The proven evidence is the progression stops and we lose the value of culture in certain areas which we may not be fully aware of.
Nevertheless, we consider that the zone of In-Between remains abundance and it only occurs among people while the ones who have unique personality and independent thinking are connected and interacted thru a specific form. Such interaction will lead to precious creativeness and inspire more and more thoughts and opportunities.